| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:48 am Post subject: All's FAIR (White) & Love IS War: Deadly Playa Hatin'?? |
 |
|
MODIFICATION OF CRESS THEORY OF COLOR CONFRONTATION (?) 4.0 (4th version before conducting experiment. Any substantive change made since the last version is in indicated by bold, lower-case font)
DEFINITION
WHITE SUPREMACY = A behavioral system that guarantees that all persons in the known universe who are not classified as “white”, by the most powerful of those persons who so classify THEMSELVES, are mistreated or denied help on the basis of color and/or factors associated with color.
HYPOTHESIS
The purpose of the system of Racism/White Supremacy, as defined above, is to provide greater access for White Supremacists to sexual intercourse and/or "sexual play" with people of all skin shades (including what is commonly referred to as “white”) than would exist without the system.
PHENOMENA (preliminary evidence that suggests that this hypothesis could be true):
1. Only sex seems to rival Racism/White Supremacy in its power to motivate the behavior of people in the known universe. Before the existence of R/WS, it is likely that sex was the most powerful force motivating the behavior of people. It is likely, therefore, that sex was the most powerful factor motivating the establishment of Racism/White Supremacy.
2. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white female as the most ideal sexual mate, many of the persons who have explicitly stated that they are, in fact, Racists/White Supremacists have engaged in frequent sexual intercourse with nonwhite females.
3. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white female as the most ideal sexual mate, many nonwhite males persistently show sexual preference for the physical traits generally present only in nonwhite females.
4. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white male as the most ideal sexual mate, many white males express their desire/fantasy to be able to sexually please a white female by possessing a black penis and or providing the white female with a sexual experience with a "black" penis.
5. When some nonwhite persons have spoken to audiences in which there are both white and nonwhite people present, no statement has elicited a greater objection from white persons than a proposal that white people and nonwhite people abstain from having sex with one another until Racism/White Supremacy is eliminated.
6. It is likely that the first significant expansion period of R/WS commenced in 1492; the year that white people in Spain expelled the nonwhite people known as “Moores” who had dominated the activity in that region for over 700 years. And, who, through their sexual success with the lighter complexioned people there upon their arrival, are responsible for the darker skin, hair, and eyes found there today. This sexual success was achieved without the violence that accompanied the sex between white males and nonwhite females subsequent to that expansion. It is worth noting that the game of Chess, with its white and black pieces (most of which resemble a penis) , is said by white people to have been invented for use as a military strategy tool for the "Spaniards" (white people) in their battles against the "Moores" (black people). The most valuable of all of a player's pieces is the female. The object of the game is to immobilize the most powerful male of the opposition. In this game, the white pieces are always one move ahead of the black pieces. Skill in Chess is the most prestigious skill of all board games played by white people
EXPERIMENTATION
This experiment is designed to answer two questions:
I. Do white people sexually prefer nonwhite people over white people? If the answer to this question is "yes", it follows that white males and white females would have reduced sexual access to each other without a global compensatory system, i.e., Racism/White Supremacy.
II.Will Racist Man/Woman , at least temporarily, trade the racist (white supremacist) behavior for counter-racist behavior that affords them significant access to sexual attention/play with nonwhite persons ?
The experiment requires two retreat type conferences entitled something like “Ending Racism/White Supremacy in One Year”. Each conference should be at least seven days in length. There will be between twelve and twenty-four participants at each conference evenly divided between:
•White people and nonwhite people (specifically those people commonly referred to as “black”)
•Male and female people
•People whose age is >18yrs and <30yrs and people whose age is > 30yrs
Three nonwhite male participants and three nonwhite female participants will be chosen by the managing scientist(s) using the criteria of Counter-Racist skill, as judged by the managing scientist(s). The remainder of the male participants will be those applicants receiving the greatest number of anonymous female votes from the applicants. The remainder of the female participants will be chosen in like manner by the male applicants. The application and selection process will utilize internet technology and require the submission of a brief essay and photo.
Except for the participants selected by the managing scientist(s), no one will participate in both conferences. Participants will be recruited from orgainzations who purport to have missions of "Social Justice" or similar objectives. Ideally, the entire conference, including travel and lodging costs will be provided at no cost to the participants and in a highly desirable "vacation spot". This would serve as an incentive to ensure that the white people who attend do not already have an atypical preference for nonwhite people sexually.
The following stipulations will be operative at each conference:
1. No names or other identifying information or any other “real” identifying information of applicants/participants will be made available to any of the applicants/participants by the managing scientist(s).
2. The participants will be given passwords to be admitted to the conference so that they will not be required to identify themselves to any participant. Participants will be required to lock up all peronal belongings except toletries and cosmetics and to wear identical suits of clothing issued at the beginning of the conference.
3. Food, shelter, on-site entertainment, comforts, and conveniences will be only those present prior to the arrival of any participants.
4. No writing materials may be present except in a group setting monitored by the managing Scientist(s) and may not be used by persons who have met one-to-one as described below until enough time/activity has passed so that the memory of any contact information, possible to be given surreptitiously, will have lapsed.
5. Participants will be restricted from meeting one-to-one except as provided below:
5.1 Each white participant will be issued one or more "Initiate" tokens which will be coded to identify the gender of the holder. One or more "Intitiate" tokens, depending on the conference, will be required to be submitted to the managing scientist for a white participant to invite another participant, either white or nonwhite, of either gender , to a one-to-one meeting. Each white participant will also be issued "Respond" tokens. Non-white participants will only be issued "Respond" tokens. The participants will be told that there are variations among them in the number of each of the two token types issued but will not be told that the number varies only with the participant's color classification.
5.1.1. 1st Conference: Each white participant will receive exactly three tokens. One, and only one, token will be required to meet one-to-one with another participant. Invitations to meet must be submitted through the managing scientist(s) and may be initiated only by white participants. Both the person who invites and the person who accepts must use a token.
5.1.2. 2nd Conference: Three days before the end of the conference, all white participants will be rated from “1” to “4” by a panel of the participants selected by the managing scientist(s). White participants will receive a quantity of"Initiate" tokens equal to his/her rating. Equal numbers of white participants will receive each of the four ratings, putting the white participants in competition with one another for opportunities to engage in one-to-one meetings.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS
I. Do white people sexually prefer nonwhite people over white people? If the answer to this question is "yes", it follows that white males and white females would have reduced sexual access to each other without a global compensatory system, i.e., Racism/White Supremacy.
This question will be answered by comparing the number of tokens spent by white participants, at both conferences, on one-to-one meetings with white persons of the opposite gender to those spent with nonwhite persons of the opposite gender
By allowing the white participants to remain anonymous, they will experience the freedom to make “selfish” choices about how to spend their sexual currency. In this setting, the only sexual currency will be physical attractiveness and knowledge about how the system of Racism (white Supremacy) works.
II.Will Racist Man/Woman , at least temporarily, trade the racist (white supremacist) behavior for counter-racist behavior that affords them significant access to sexual attention/play with nonwhite persons ?
This question will be answered by comparing the amount of useful counter-racist information communicated by the white participants at the second conference to that given by white participants at the first conference. The criteria for rating the amount of counter-racist information will be developed by the managing Scientist(s) prior to the 1st conference.
Posts or PMs with constructive suggestions are requested.
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what?
Last edited by HelixHair on Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:34 pm; edited 30 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward Williams
Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003
Posts: 3136
Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 8:50 am Post subject: Re: VARIATION ON CRESS THEORY OF COLOR CONFRONTATION |
|
|
| HelixHair wrote: |
VARIATION ON CRESS THEORY OF COLOR CONFRONTATION
Phenomena (preliminary evidence that suggests that this hypothesis might be true):
1. Sex seems to be second only to Racism/White Supremacy in its power to motivate the behavior of people in the known universe. Before the existence of R/WS, it is likely that sex was the most powerful force motivating the behavior of people. It is likely, therefore, that sex was the most powerful factor motivating the establishment of Racism/White Supremacy. |
I suspect this statement is true.
| HelixHair wrote: |
| 2. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white female as the most ideal sexual mate, many of the persons who have explicitly stated that they are, in fact, Racists/White Supremacists have engaged in frequent sexual intercourse with nonwhite females. |
I suspect this statement is incomplete. The sexual perversion of the white female as the "ideal mate" for males is only evident in the victims of racism (white supremacy).
| HelixHair wrote: |
| 3. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white female as the most ideal sexual mate, many nonwhite males persistently show sexual preference for the physical traits generally present only in nonwhite females. |
I suspect this statement is true.
| HelixHair wrote: |
| 4. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white male as the most ideal sexual mate, many white males express their desire/fantasy to be able to sexually please a white female by possessing a black penis and or providing the white female with a sexual experience with a "black" penis. |
I suspect this statement could be false. What are the mechanics for testing this specific observed phenomenon?
| HelixHair wrote: |
| 5. When speaking to audiences in which there are both white and nonwhite people, no statement elicits a greater response from white persons than a proposal that white people and nonwhite people abstaining from having sex with one another until Racism/White Supremacy is eliminated. |
I suspect this statement could be true but there is insufficient data to support it. Do you have any scientific documented data to support this statement?
| HelixHair wrote: |
6. It is likely that the first significant expansion period of R/WS commenced in 1492; the year that white people in Spain expelled the nonwhite people known as “Moores” who had dominated the activity in that region for over 700 years. And, who, through their sexual success with the lighter complexioned people there when the Moores arrived, are responsible for the darker skin, hair, and eyes found there today. This sexual success was achieved without the violence that accompanied the sex that accompanied the sex between white males and nonwhite females subsequent to that expansion. It is worth noting that the game of Chess, with its white and black pieces, is said by white people to have been invented for use as a military strategy tool for the "Spaniards" (white people) in their battles against the "Moores" (black people).
|
I suspect this statement could be false. There is archeological evidence and/or anthropological evidence that white people "expanded" into other areas of the world long before the year of their lord 1492, as documented in the works of people such as Diop, Van Sertima, Obenga, and others. Please take into account their information could be false as well.
I will finish responding soon!
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 12:07 pm Post subject: Re: VARIATION ON CRESS THEORY OF COLOR CONFRONTATION |
|
|
| Virtual_ God wrote: |
| HelixHair wrote: |
2. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white female as the most ideal sexual mate, many of the persons who have explicitly stated that they are, in fact, Racists/White Supremacists have engaged in frequent sexual intercourse with nonwhite females. |
The sexual perversion of the white female as the "ideal mate" for males is only evident in the victims of racism (white supremacy). |
This is my suspicion as well. An objective of this experiment is to test that suspicion.
| Virtual_ God wrote: |
| HelixHair wrote: |
| 4. Though the powerful system of R/WS promotes the white male as the most ideal sexual mate, many white males express their desire/fantasy to be able to sexually please a white female by possessing a black penis and or providing the white female with a sexual experience with a "black" penis. |
I suspect this statement could be false. What are the mechanics for testing this specific observed phenomenon? |
The hypothesis, not the preliminary evidence, is being tested. However, I observed the phenomena by researching patterns in pornographic literature. The first time I became aware of this phenomenon was when reading The Autobiography of Malcolm X many years ago when I was an undergraduate student.
| Virtual_ God wrote: |
| HelixHair wrote: |
5. When speaking to audiences in which there are both white and nonwhite people, no statement elicits a greater response from white persons than a proposal that white people and nonwhite people abstaining from having sex with one another until Racism/White Supremacy is eliminated . |
I suspect this statement could be true but there is insufficient data to support it. Do you have any scientific documented data to support this statement? |
Again, the hypothesis, not the phenomenon, is being tested. However, I think it is correct to revise the 5th phenomenon statement should from “When speaking to audiences…” to “When some nonwhite persons have spoken to audiences about Racism/White Supremacy….
| Virtual_ God wrote: |
| HelixHair wrote: |
6. It is likely that the first significant expansion period of R/WS commenced in 1492; the year that white people in Spain expelled the nonwhite people known as “Moores” who had dominated the activity in that region for over 700 years. And, who, through their sexual success with the lighter complexioned people there when the Moores arrived, are responsible for the darker skin, hair, and eyes found there today. This sexual success was achieved without the violence that accompanied the sex that accompanied the sex between white males and nonwhite females subsequent to that expansion. It is worth noting that the game of Chess, with its white and black pieces, is said by white people to have been invented for use as a military strategy tool for the "Spaniards" (white people) in their battles against the "Moores" (black people). |
I suspect this statement could be false. There is archeological evidence and/or anthropological evidence that white people "expanded" into other areas of the world long before the year of their lord 1492, as documented in the works of people such as Diop, Van Sertima, Obenga, and others. Please take into account their information could be false as well. |
Is the presence of persons who, today, would be called “white” evidence of the practice of Racism/White Supremacy concurrent with the breathing of those people? I am not aware of any documented evidence of a period earlier than circa 1492 when Racist Man/ Woman brought into subjection large numbers of people inhabiting land a great distance from the lands white people had predominantly occupied. Nor am I aware of any evidence that, prior to circa 1492, Racist Man/Woman brought into subjection nonwhite people inhabiting the same land areas predominantly inhabited by people who, today, would be called “white people.” Will you please bring to my attention any such evidence?
Thank you for your feedback.
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are a couple of other topics related to these phenomena I'd like to briefly discuss....
1) The year 1492 is not only the year that the Moores were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula (Spain, Portugal) as well as "White" people who profess the practice of Judaisam (commonly called Ashkenazi Jews-. Darker skinned Jews are commonly called Sephardic Jews) It is also the year that at least one Racist Suspect and puportedly white Jew, Christopher Columbus, left the peninsula to find a new route to areas populated by nonwhite people (India) but found a "New World" inhabited by people, "Native Americans", who were promptly mistreated on the basis of color and , as they died from the brutality, replaced by "black" people who proved to be more reliable subjects.
2) Virtual_God did an excelllent job of pointing out inconsistent phenomena and logic in the current version of the Cress Theory. Some of those inconsistencies were brought to my attention for the first time in his post in the "Following the Logic" forum of this board.
There was one other inconsistency I wanted to discuss. Fear of "genetic anihilation" would seem to require a great concern for the viability of successive generations which I have not seen evidenced in white people collectively. To the contrary, white people collectively have acted in ways which benefit their current generation of white people but which they know will be to the detriment of their progeny. I have observed this in the behavior of white people who use fossil fuels and chop down massive numbers of trees. Though not as strong as counter-evidence, white peoople run governments with deficit spending which could possibly put some white people of future generations at a disadvantage to other white people of those generations....
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what?
Last edited by HelixHair on Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:21 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams
Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003
Posts: 3136
Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In your hypothesis, are you stating that the purpose of white supremacy (racism) is to allow white people the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) pay non-white people less money on jobs than white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) will give a white person an Oscar rather than give it to a non-white person is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) follow non-white people around department stores and not follow white people around department stores is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) lynch and burn non-white people and not lynch and burn white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
I could go on and on...but...is this what your hypothesis is stating?
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:32 pm Post subject: Why was the slang term "Fuck" used? |
|
|
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
In your hypothesis, are you stating that the purpose of white supremacy (racism) is to allow white people the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) pay non-white people less money on jobs than white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) will give a white person an Oscar rather than give it to a non-white person is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) follow non-white people around department stores and not follow white people around department stores is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) lynch and burn non-white people and not lynch and burn white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
I could go on and on...but...is this what your hypothesis is stating? |
Before I respond to your questions, will you please tell me why you chose to use the word "fuck" instead of the terms "sexual intercourse" , "sexual play", "have sex", etc. And, can you tell me why you chose to put the word "fuck" in bold font? I am asking so that I can judge whether it would be correct for me to use that word for the purpose(s) you chose to use it.
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams
Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003
Posts: 3136
Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:41 pm Post subject: Re: Why was the slang term "Fuck" used? |
|
|
| HelixHair wrote: |
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
In your hypothesis, are you stating that the purpose of white supremacy (racism) is to allow white people the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) pay non-white people less money on jobs than white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) will give a white person an Oscar rather than give it to a non-white person is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) follow non-white people around department stores and not follow white people around department stores is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) lynch and burn non-white people and not lynch and burn white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
I could go on and on...but...is this what your hypothesis is stating? |
Before I respond to your questions, will you please tell me why you chose to use the word "fuck" instead of the terms "sexual intercourse" , "sexual play", "have sex", etc. And, can you tell me why you chose to put the word "fuck" in bold font? I am asking so that I can judge whether it would be correct for me to use that word for the purpose(s) you chose to use it. |
Oh sure...I used that word as an extra emphasis in substitution for "sexual intercourse". Usually when people think about sexual intercourse it is more of an academic term but no matter how the word "fuck" is used there is some emphasis on it...even if it is not being used to reveal truth (untrue definition). The bold font gives it that much more emphasis.
If you'd rather use the term "sexual intercourse" we can...no problem there. I give both terms the same definition...the definition that is in the Counter-Racist Definitionary.
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 5:33 pm Post subject: Re: Why was the slang term "Fuck" used? |
|
|
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
| HelixHair wrote: |
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
In your hypothesis, are you stating that the purpose of white supremacy (racism) is to allow white people the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) pay non-white people less money on jobs than white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) will give a white person an Oscar rather than give it to a non-white person is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) follow non-white people around department stores and not follow white people around department stores is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) lynch and burn non-white people and not lynch and burn white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
I could go on and on...but...is this what your hypothesis is stating? |
Before I respond to your questions, will you please tell me why you chose to use the word "fuck" instead of the terms "sexual intercourse" , "sexual play", "have sex", etc. And, can you tell me why you chose to put the word "fuck" in bold font? I am asking so that I can judge whether it would be correct for me to use that word for the purpose(s) you chose to use it. |
Oh sure...I used that word as an extra emphasis in substitution for "sexual intercourse". Usually when people think about sexual intercourse it is more of an academic term but no matter how the word "fuck" is used there is some emphasis on it...even if it is not being used to reveal truth (untrue definition). The bold font gives it that much more emphasis.
If you'd rather use the term "sexual intercourse" we can...no problem there. I give both terms the same definition...the definition that is in the Counter-Racist Definitionary. |
Thank you for that explanation. In this context, I'd prefer to use another term. Though, I believe I now understand your reasons for using the slang term.
No, I do not believe that these are accurate statements. My hypothesis states that the purpose of Racism/ White Supremacy, for those who practice it, is to give them greater access to sexual attention, sexual play, and/or sexual intercourse with both white AND nonwhite people than they would have if Racism/White Supremacy never existed or if it is eliminated. The behaviors you cite are part of the SYSTEM of Racism/White Supremacy. The SYSTEM produces a net gain in sexual opportunities for people classified as white. It may be that Racist Man and Racist Woman have struck a deal with one another to ensure sexual access to each other even though they are not the sexual preference for one another and maximize their opportunity for sex with nonwhite people by maintaining the power dynamic of White over Nonwhite; more resources, better health, control of aesthetic and power images, etc..
This hypothesis is counter-intuitive because sex is generally associated with affectionate/friendly/kind emotions or intentions. But, I’m not sure that association is present in people who are persistently not favored sexually. This hypothesis may also be counter-intuitive for non-white people because almost all most of us have or have had some amount of contrived attraction to white people sexually and, so, have difficulty understanding why white people would feel a need to coerce us into paying them sexual attention.
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
copious
Joined: 29 May 2003
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2003 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been reading this topic since the start, interesting indeed. Oh yea, the responses will be out of order of posts.
| HelixHair wrote: |
Is the presence of persons who, today, would be called “white” evidence of the practice of Racism/White Supremacy concurrent with the breathing of those people? I am not aware of any documented evidence of a period earlier than circa 1492 when Racist Man/ Woman brought into subjection large numbers of people inhabiting land a great distance from the lands white people had predominantly occupied. Nor am I aware of any evidence that, prior to circa 1492, Racist Man/Woman brought into subjection nonwhite people inhabiting the same land areas predominantly inhabited by people who, today, would be called “white people.” Will you please bring to my attention any such evidence? |
I could be wrong but, did ancient Egypt get overrun by the Romans and the Greeks? White people even made a movie with Liz Taylor glorifing the behavior of ceaser with Cleo. Remember? Sex, but no babies.
Helix: Your experiment could be dangerous for the VICITMS of racism. They are all ready confused as to the correct and just direction they should choose to COUNTER Racism. Subverting their victim-hood with a GAME could spell disaster like an Accidentals (black key on piano) NON-WHITE babys being copulated via white and nonwhite persons; suspect behavior consists of CONFUSION and FEAR in the victim and RAPE on the behalf of the white person. I say RAPE because any white person conscious of the white over non-white factor (supreme political power system - Racism) FUCKING non-white people is RAPE.
I have been thinking a great deal lately about the MECHANISMS in which Racism functions. In other words I'm not just looking at the Clock FACE spin round I wondering how the GEARS inside that beast are moving and how the whole thing is constructed to keep the system FUNCTIONAL. I gather that is what you are wondering - specificly in the area of SEX.
Phenomena:
1. I believe this is accurate. Sex is really the reason people do what they do in all areas to some degree. I believe. I recently saw a comedian say something to this effect: "The men by big houses, sharp suits, and fast motor cars to attract potential females who may engage in SEX. The males really don;t CARE about the materials they only get them to get the females! The females are the GATHERERS the COLLECT items to to SECURE themselves and the SEEDS they bear. Meanwhile the men fight each other and nature in an attempt to gather more RESOURCES in order to please the FEMALE/S who IS/ARE or potentially will give him SEX and SEED."
It was interesting the way it was put. I hope I gave an accurate portrait of what I heard and I'll try to find an exact word for word copy if you'd like it. Funny thing is, I thought thats the best way I've ever heard it put. IT being the mechanism or motivation for SEX and SEED.
2. This comment strikes me as an assumption. The only real part I agree with is promotion of the White female as the desire for SEX and SEED. I keep seeing commercials targeted at CHILDREN with non-white little boys AWED by some blond blue haired female. Weapon of Mass Distraction = Media (television, print, radio). I really am gearing up to do a few large pieces on this very topic. The persuasion of the Caucasian.
3. I also see this as an assumption. I haven't seen a YOUNG black couple where I live since... DAMN! ... since 1998! I live in Virginia so there are lots of black males and females but the system has them CONFUSED! Homosexual White males hooked up with GEORGIOUS black females! While the WHITE firends laugh at the amuement of it all. Hiding behind JOKE as the focus of the laughter.
Black males walked around like red wagon on wheels with WHITE females. The white females also insist that they behave like NIGGERS - NO sense (fighting, cussing, smoking pot, NIGGA this, NIGGA that, ect)- while they (white females) joke about it with their white girl friends (white females don't have BLACK girlfriends - anywhere). It's one big joke.
I had this white girl's MOTHER - attempt to woe me. She would invite me over and kick it in front of the TV with the lights off with wine and cigarettes, rubbing up close to me on the couch. She liked to touch me too. you know on the leg and giggle at mundane stuff - she KEPT black men. She say I was thinking -working - may be coming out the matrix and she got to work. didn;t get me though, though the thought of the easy FUCK made me double check, but I couldn;t play myself like that. Cause after she FUCKED me, I would still be BLACK and she would be the White. Insane. Incorrect. Mass Rape of the non-white mind and body.
4. Not sure where you got this one. I think the white male is AFRAID of the dominant MELONEN genes the Black male and female poses and that ultimately the FEMALE will attempt to SECURE the MOST DOMINENT genetic data she can for SEX and SEED. This is why white male attempts to keep white female under lock and key. Who do you think FUNDS and ALLOWS white women to WORK in media and areas of attention to persuade the other white women when it's time to CHANGE startagies in regards to SEX?
I suspect the last person FUNDING the operation of Racism is a WHITE male.
5. I agree here. It's interesting how you and V_G got into discussion about why white people engage in SEX or as V_G said Fucking with the victim if the objective is genetic domination. Don;t they know they playing with FIRE? One drop of genetic data run a miss.. and ... POP GOES THE WEASAL! In other words Non-White babies could happen if white people ant careful. and too many non-white people mean the system gets more expensive to OPPERATE which means JOBS to would be EMPLOYEES could be LOST right? I think the potential answer to question delves a little deeper than one sentence or ONE objective. Lets not forget the white supremacist are fighting amongst themselves for ULTIMATE SUPREMACY of the SUPREME!!
White males - in my theory - ant all in the same department or even in the same company. As with any business MARKETING (the female SEX and SEED) wants to SPEND SPEND SPEND while MANAGMENT (White males who do all the grunt WORK / Guards) and perhaps the BOARD of TRUSTIES(Warden / Supreme Racists who do the planing)want to take a more strategic slice at the MARKET (Non-White people per capita). There are OTHER groups of white people competing to CONTROL the market too (EURO vs DOLLAR?), and those OTHER white people in that OTHER company are in the way. One may BUY (USA?) out the other or a HOSTILE take over could occur (WWII?) - who knows!
The point is the system of racism is a BUSINESS. It's run like a business and some people may want to TEST the product for QUALITY ASSURENCES and others may think that too much QA is cutting into MANUFACTURING COST (Cost of Constructing/Maintaining/Expanding/Refining - Racism).
In other words ALL logical assumptions are VALID! So what's the POINT? Point is Racist are going to keep trying to DOUBLE margins EVERY year, and in a CUT THROAT business such as this ill gotten gains from OTHER racists are liable to happen. So, expect for Racist STEAL PRODUCT (Lanky white pimple face BOYS with AWESOME black women; [skakes head]), others are gonna SELL trade secrets and/or DEFECT to another company, some do it for MATERIAL GAIN (non-white people they Directly control in their environment - even if they are their children and spouses) and others for the THRILL (random RAPE of black males by White females who are unattractive to WHITE males who are looking for SEX and SEED).
It's all up for grabs, it ALL benefits the system. The more non-white people the LARGER the Market - so long and SUPPLY doesn;t outstrip DEMAND (white people having more Non-whites than they can control.
6. This somewhat pertains to 5. WHITE WASHING! This is a term I came to use once to myself as I was thinking about Whites ACCEPTING and WELCOMING non-white babies with LIGHTER skin. I think ultimately whites are preparing several END GAME stratagys (ie., Check MATE in X number of moves)! One of the strategies is to BLEEDt he Black out of non-whites and give them the DESIRE to PERSUE that lighter WHITER non-black or brown skin. This way the victims SEEK the genetic TRAITS of the oppressor while eventually they to get to become LIKE the OPPRESSOR.... Eventually, they.. HOPE..I got EVIDENCE for his ALL READY happening!
Genetic testing will allow for ALL people to know who has WHAT in them. All families that EVER where, will be able to be CROSS linked. Experiments of MUTANT (Accidentals and Mulattoes) copulation will be CHECKED for how the BREED came out. (There are a WHOLE lot of white people HIDING black genetic lineage in this country!.. I got PROOF of this.. Historical evidence) White males with BLACK features? White females with FULL bottoms and desirable BLACK features in a WHITE body may be accepted. (White females are having much trouble reproducing most likely due to white males DOMINATING their feminine FORM.. Remember, FAINTING ROOMS?)
All the darkest blacks with undesirable traits will be killed off with aids, ebola, west Nile, etc. The END game is close. With the nearing of the MACHINE that is going to be capable of doing all the NIGGER work, white people may have no more use for niggers. Don;t say it wont happen. Remember the Indians? How about Eskimos? Hawaii ? Cuba? Dominican Republic?
White washed as in genetically CLEANed or made more SUITable. SEX and SEED.
Thank you, for your interest. Comments and or Questions?
cope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams
Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003
Posts: 3136
Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2003 7:12 am Post subject: Re: Why was the slang term "Fuck" used? |
|
|
| HelixHair wrote: |
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
| HelixHair wrote: |
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
In your hypothesis, are you stating that the purpose of white supremacy (racism) is to allow white people the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) pay non-white people less money on jobs than white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) will give a white person an Oscar rather than give it to a non-white person is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) follow non-white people around department stores and not follow white people around department stores is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) lynch and burn non-white people and not lynch and burn white people is because white people want the ability to fuck non-white people?
I could go on and on...but...is this what your hypothesis is stating? |
Before I respond to your questions, will you please tell me why you chose to use the word "fuck" instead of the terms "sexual intercourse" , "sexual play", "have sex", etc. And, can you tell me why you chose to put the word "fuck" in bold font? I am asking so that I can judge whether it would be correct for me to use that word for the purpose(s) you chose to use it. |
Oh sure...I used that word as an extra emphasis in substitution for "sexual intercourse". Usually when people think about sexual intercourse it is more of an academic term but no matter how the word "fuck" is used there is some emphasis on it...even if it is not being used to reveal truth (untrue definition). The bold font gives it that much more emphasis.
If you'd rather use the term "sexual intercourse" we can...no problem there. I give both terms the same definition...the definition that is in the Counter-Racist Definitionary. |
Thank you for that explanation. In this context, I'd prefer to use another term. Though, I believe I now understand your reasons for using the slang term.
No, I do not believe that these are accurate statements. |
These are questions...questions that when answered will lead me to a better understanding of how racism (whiye supremacy) works.
I will list the questions again without the "slang term":
In your hypothesis, are you stating that the purpose of white supremacy (racism) is to allow white people greater access for sexual intercourse with non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) pay non-white people less money on jobs than white people is because white people want greater access to sexual intercourse with non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) will give a white person an Oscar rather than give it to a non-white person is because white people want greater access to sexual intercourse with non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) follow non-white people around department stores and not follow white people around department stores is because white people want greater access to sexual intercourse with non-white people?
Are you stating in your hypothesis that the reason white people that practice white supremacy (racism) lynch and burn non-white people and not lynch and burn white people is because white people want greater access to sexual intercourse with non-white people?
Please advise.
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
COPIOUS,
BARRING UNFORSEEN EVENTS, I WILL BE RESPOND TO YOUR VERY INTERESTING POST BY THUR MIDNIGHT 10/03. I OPENED IT JUST A FEWW MINUTES AGO AND HAVE NOT FINISHED READING IT. I AM REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO READING AND THINKING ABOUT YOUR COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR VERY CONSIDERED FEEDBACK!
V_God, I will read and respond to yours as well though it may take an additional day. As always, your considered feedback is very appreciated.
Hh
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2003 3:47 am Post subject: UNFORSEEN EVENTS |
|
|
UNFORTUNATELY, UNFORSEEN EVENTS OCURRED TODAY. DURING THE EXISTENCE OF WHITE SUPREMACY, THIS KIND OF THING SHOULD BE EXPECTED ...WILL RESPOND TO COPIOUS'S AND V_GOD'S POSTS BY MINNIGHT PST FRI AND SAT RESPECIVELY....
BARRING FURTHER UNFORSEEN EVENTS.
Hh
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 12:27 am Post subject: Is color sexually preferred? |
|
|
| Copious wrote: |
| could be wrong but, did ancient Egypt get overrun by the Romans and the Greeks? White people even made a movie with Liz Taylor glorifing the behavior of ceaser with Cleo. Remember? Sex, but no babies. |
There is ample evidence that this occured. I am also aware of ample evidence that the Greeks and Romans were preceded by Arab invaders and that, still others, advance proof of pale people mistreating darker skinned people in other locations at earlier times. What I’m looking for is evidence that such occurrences were part of the already established global SYSTEM of Racism/White Supremacy rather than tribalism or simple color hatred/bias/preference/etc.
| Copious wrote: |
| Helix: Your experiment could be dangerous for the VICITMS of racism. They are all ready confused as to the correct and just direction they should choose to COUNTER Racism. Subverting their victim-hood with a GAME could spell disaster like an Accidentals (black key on piano) NON-WHITE babys being copulated via white and nonwhite persons; suspect behavior consists of CONFUSION and FEAR in the victim and RAPE on the behalf of the white person. I say RAPE because any white person conscious of the white over non-white factor (supreme political power system - Racism) FUCKING non-white people is RAPE. |
Indeed. The purpose of having 3 nonwhite males and 3 nonwhite females, selected for counter-racist skill present at both conferences is to prepare the other nonwhite attendees for what they are about to “see” as well as to steer them through the house of mirrors during the process. The nonwhite people who attend will, by virtue of their participation, be self-selected as nonwhite people who would have been or already have been “easy pickings” for Racist Man/Woman. It would seem that these are the very people who are most in need of help in “Area 8.” But, Copious, what is proposed is not intended to be a “game.” It is intended to be an experiment to help replace White Supremacy with Justice.
| Copious wrote: |
| I have been thinking a great deal lately about the MECHANISMS in which Racism functions. In other words I'm not just looking at the Clock FACE spin round I wondering how the GEARS inside that beast are moving and how the whole thing is constructed to keep the system FUNCTIONAL. I gather that is what you are wondering - specifically in the area of SEX. |
Yes, I aim to test the hypothesis that sex is the foundation of R/WS.
| Copious wrote: |
Phenomena:
1.
I believe this is accurate. Sex is really the reason people do what they do in all areas to some degree. I believe. I recently saw a comedian say something to this effect: "The men by big houses, sharp suits, and fast motor cars to attract potential females who may engage in SEX. The males really don;t CARE about the materials they only get them to get the females! The females are the GATHERERS the COLLECT items to SECURE themselves and the SEEDS they bear. Meanwhile the men fight each other and nature in an attempt to gather more RESOURCES in order to please the FEMALE/S who IS/ARE or potentially will give him SEX and SEED."
It was interesting the way it was put. I hope I gave an accurate portrait of what I heard and I'll try to find an exact word for word copy if you'd like it. Funny thing is, I thought thats the best way I've ever heard it put. IT being the mechanism or motivation for SEX and SEED. |
“Sex and seed” LOL. Works for me! Humor, derives, I think from people pointing out what you’ve been looking at have never “seen” Good comedians are usually the most perceptive people in an area.
| Copious wrote: |
| 2. This comment strikes me as an assumption. The only real part I agree with is promotion of the White female as the desire for SEX and SEED. I keep seeing commercials targeted at CHILDREN with non-white little boys AWED by some blond blue haired female. Weapon of Mass Distraction = Media (television, print, radio). I really am gearing up to do a few large pieces on this very topic. The persuasion of the Caucasian. |
I assure you, I have not assumed this phenomenon. On this continent, the existence of the huge array of skin colors among people commonly called “black” is sufficient proof. Further, if you read interviews of black female prostitutes, you will find ample evidence of this phenomenon. If you want first-hand knowledge, you can visit some of the XXX chat lines or bulletin boards and register as a black female. And don’t forget Mark Furhman. Don’t expect Racist Man to knowingly give you truth in disclosure on this or any other topic.
| Copious wrote: |
3. I also see this as an assumption. I haven't seen a YOUNG black couple where I live since... DAMN! ... since 1998! I live in Virginia so there are lots of black males and females but the system has them CONFUSED! Homosexual White males hooked up with GEORGIOUS black females! While the WHITE firends laugh at the amuement of it all. Hiding behind JOKE as the focus of the laughter.
Black males walked around like red wagon on wheels with WHITE females. The white females also insist that they behave like NIGGERS - NO sense (fighting, cussing, smoking pot, NIGGA this, NIGGA that, ect)- while they (white females) joke about it with their white girl friends (white females don't have BLACK girlfriends - anywhere). It's one big joke. |
White male homosexuals with black females are a tragic cliché. I concur with Mr. Fuller’s explanation for why this keeps happening. Mr. Fuller says that the black female has little basis on which to suspect unusual behavior in a white male. And, if the black female does suspect that the white male’s comings and goings are strange, she has no authority to question him. So, the nonwhite female is often the perfect cover for the white male homosexual.
However, our observations do not match when it comes to the sexual preferences of black males. Southern California was showing the phenomenon you described in the span between the mid seventies and the early nineties. However, that is not seen much here today. It’s not unusual to see black males and females with Asian/PI, Latino, etc. but even black males usually pursue black females even if they dress, speak, and have musical tastes similar to white males. The aesthetic standard of large, round buttocks and dense musculature, pigmented skin and full lips seem to be the preference of the vast majority of all males in this area. And even during the aforementioned era when TV, magazine, and movie images were emphasizing the desirability of small butts, many black men were emphatic about their preference for the opposite.
| Copious wrote: |
| 4. Not sure where you got this one. I think the white male is AFRAID of the dominant MELONEN genes the Black male and female poses and that ultimately the FEMALE will attempt to SECURE the MOST DOMINENT genetic data she can for SEX and SEED. |
I answered this query in another post recently. Have you read The Autobiography of Malcolm X? You will find a reference to it there. In pornographic print and film, you'll also find ample evidence of the white male's desire to posess the phallus of the black male in order to please the white female. My observations also lead me to believe that white male is afraid that he cannot satisfy a black female sexually although he prefers her. Since, the "dominant" genetic traits are generally those that have been most sexually selected (most " attract -ive) I have a corollary hypothesis that the white male "holds the white female under lock and key" because she is least likely to reject him sexually.
I agree with you that the white male benefits more than the white female from R/WS. I think you nailed it with the “sex & seed” explanation. The mating strategy of females requires less access to sexual attention than that of males. Females can be out of the sexual market for some time during pregnancy and rearing of young children. I f she becomes less sexually attractive by comparison, she usually still has some of the resources of the offspring’s father as well as those of her blood relatives. For males, it’s a numbers game because a male can never be certain that any offspring, is indeed his. It’s a race to occupy the womb. Of course these are not conscious strategies but are the biological imperatives. So, the white male has to ensure that he has far more resources than the nonwhite male so that the white female will remain available to him sexually. However, he will generally surreptitiously seek non-threatening opportunities to have sex with nonwhite females, whom he prefers
| Copious wrote: |
| 5. As with any business MARKETING (the female SEX and SEED) wants to SPEND SPEND SPEND while MANAGMENT (White males who do all the grunt WORK / Guards) |
I really like this metaphor for R/WS…inspired! That’s what I like about metaphors. By applying the metaphor you can learn about phenomena which are less familiar. Pattern finding in the universe…
| Copious wrote: |
| 6. This somewhat pertains to 5. WHITE WASHING! This is a term I came to use once to myself as I was thinking about Whites ACCEPTING and WELCOMING non-white babies with LIGHTER skin. I think ultimately whites are preparing several END GAME stratagys (ie., Check MATE in X number of moves)! One of the strategies is to BLEEDt he Black out of non-whites and give them the DESIRE to PERSUE that lighter WHITER non-black or brown skin. |
Plausible hypothesis. How can it be tested?
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams
Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003
Posts: 3136
Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
See where this leads? The white male benefits more from white supremacy (racism) than the white female? What are the mechanics for that? How can you quanitfy that?
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HelixHair
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 383
Location: Everywhere that is nowhere
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:38 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| Virtual_GOD wrote: |
| See where this leads? The white male benefits more from white supremacy (racism) than the white female? What are the mechanics for that? How can you quanitfy that? |
If I correctly understand your question, the above hypothesis would be tested("quantified") in the following manner:
1st: Test the "Modification of Cress Theory" Hypothesis
2nd: If the hypothesis is validated on repeated tests,
Design and conduct an experiment that compares the material benefits the white female will forfeit in exchange for sexual access to the nonwhite male with the material benefits the white male will forfeit for sexual access to the nonwhite female.
_________________
Death of the lower body is certain. Now what?
Last edited by HelixHair on Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
Secure Donations
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in
