View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Edward Williams Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003 Posts: 3254 Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:57 am Post subject: Correctness |
|
|
Correctness: Pronunciation Key
(1) Balance between people, in relationship to things (etc.), other than people.
(2) Balance between action, "non-action", plants, animals, sound, silence, thought, non-thought, people, animals, heat, cold, light, darkness, insects, etc.
UICCSC _________________ What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003 Posts: 3254 Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
(3) Saying, and/or, doing things in the best possible way. Meaning revealing truth in an manner that promotes justice. _________________ What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003 Posts: 3254 Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I attempted to redefine the word correctness so that it contains THE LOGIC to producing it in the definition itself. In the codebook, the definition for correctness is "balance between people and things".
The definition for the word justice in the codebook is "balance between people". The definition was changed to "guaranteeing no person is mistreated and also guaranteeing the person that needs help the most get the most help". The definition of justice was redefined so that THE LOGIC for producing the original codebook definition would be the new defininiton. In other words by "guaranteeing no person is mistreated and also guaranteeing the person who needs hep the most get the most help" you produce "balance between people".
When attempting to redefine the word correctness so that THE LOGIC for producing "balance between people and things" is the definition I found out two things:
(1) The redefined definition for the word justice produces correctness as it is defined in the codebook (balance between people and things).
(2) Generally speaking, people have no concept of what is correct and what isn't.
I've concluded, based on the evidence and THE LOGIC that the definition for correctness must be:
(1) The use of thought, speech, and/or action, in the most effective manner to promote justice. _________________ What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Edward Williams Site Admin
Joined: 12 Apr 2003 Posts: 3254 Location: I am from everywhere I've ever been and everywhere I've never been
|
Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2024 6:41 am Post subject: Re: |
|
|
Edward Williams wrote: |
I attempted to redefine the word correctness so that it contains THE LOGIC to producing it in the definition itself. In the codebook, the definition for correctness is "balance between people and things".
The definition for the word justice in the codebook is "balance between people". The definition was changed to "guaranteeing no person is mistreated and also guaranteeing the person that needs help the most get the most help". The definition of justice was redefined so that THE LOGIC for producing the original codebook definition would be the new defininiton. In other words by "guaranteeing no person is mistreated and also guaranteeing the person who needs hep the most get the most help" you produce "balance between people".
When attempting to redefine the word correctness so that THE LOGIC for producing "balance between people and things" is the definition I found out two things:
(1) The redefined definition for the word justice produces correctness as it is defined in the codebook (balance between people and things).
(2) Generally speaking, people have no concept of what is correct and what isn't.
I've concluded, based on the evidence and THE LOGIC that the definition for correctness must be:
(1) The use of thought, speech, and/or action, in the most effective manner to promote justice. |
Instead of redefining the word correctness I have decided that the definition of correctness, as found in the UICCSC is antiquated.
By redefining the word justice Mr. Fuller did away with the word correctness and it's definition of "balance between people and things" altogether. And I think he knows that.
By guaranteeing no person is mistreated and guaranteeing the person who needs help the most gets the most constructive help you produce correctness (balance between people and things) because people need "things". The balance between people and things is produced by producing justice itself. This may be the reason, if you're reading the new revised UICCSC, you see a lot of (balance between people) after you see the word "justice". This only helps to validate the continued use of the word "correctness" and its definition, which is outdated. _________________ What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|